WebP is a modern image format developed by Google that promises smaller files than JPG at the same quality. But is it always the right choice? Here's a practical comparison.
File size
WebP typically produces files that are 25–35% smaller than an equivalent JPG at the same visual quality. For a website with many images, that difference adds up to a noticeably faster page.
Quality
At equivalent settings, WebP and JPG look very similar for photographs. WebP's main advantage is that it also supports transparency and animation, which JPG cannot do.
Browser support
WebP is now supported by all current major browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. The older compatibility concerns are largely resolved.
Which should you choose?
- For the web → WebP is usually the better choice: smaller files, same quality.
- For maximum compatibility or when a specific tool requires JPG → JPG remains a safe default.
You can convert a JPG to WebP in seconds with the Compress WebP tool.
Frequently asked questions
Is WebP always smaller than JPG?
Usually, but not in every case. A very simple image can sometimes be smaller as JPG, though the difference is rarely meaningful.
Can I use WebP everywhere?
For modern websites, yes. If you need broad support for older software, JPG is safer.
Related: Compress WebP · Compress JPG · Compress JPG Without Losing Quality